Free Consultation
Book a Free Consultation
A certified valuer will listen to your situation and answer any questions you may have, at no cost.
Builders and civil contractors from the growth corridors to the Big Build, where recoverable work in progress, retentions and owned plant matter more than the turnover figure.
A Melbourne building or civil contracting business is valued from its adjusted net assets: plant at market value, work in progress on a realistic completion basis, retentions and claims at what is genuinely recoverable, and defect obligations deducted. Because project margins swing from year to year, the income cross-check uses earnings across a full cycle rather than a single period.
The reasons run from the ordinary to the urgent: selling to a larger contractor, bringing a site manager into the ownership, a family law settlement, refinancing an excavator fleet, a bonding or pre-qualification requirement for government work, an insolvency or a dispute with a principal, or an ATO market value requirement on a restructure. Principals and financiers on larger projects often want to see the equity behind a contractor before they award work or extend a facility.
Construction is the sector where turnover misleads most. A Pakenham home builder can turn over a great deal and hold very little, because the cash is tied up in work in progress, retentions and claims that may never be paid, and the margin on each job is narrow. The valuation separates the activity from the value a buyer would actually pay for.
A certified valuer will listen to your situation and answer any questions you may have, at no cost.
The Asset Approach leads. Contract earnings swing with the cycle and with individual projects, while the plant and working capital tied up in the business are large, so the adjusted net asset position is the most dependable place to start.
Under the adjusted net assets method each asset and liability is restated to market or recoverable value: excavators, trucks and site plant at what they would sell for; work in progress on a realistic completion basis rather than at claimed value; retentions by age and the likelihood of collection; variations and claims only where they are genuinely probable and documented; debtors net of provisions; and contingent liabilities, including the defect and warranty obligations that follow a builder for years after handover.
The income approach serves as the cross-check, using earnings measured across a full cycle, normally five years, because a single strong or weak year tells you little. Where a contractor holds a genuinely contracted forward work book with credible margins, for example a panel position on utility renewal work or a signed subcontract on a Big Build package, the income result can lead and the asset figure becomes the floor.
Earnings across a full cycle, capitalised after owner remuneration is reset to market. The risk loading is high, because contract concentration, fixed-price exposure and the industry's own insolvency record all sit in the rate.
Sales of contractors of comparable size and discipline inform the range. The evidence is thin and skewed by the number of construction businesses that change hands under stress, so comparables are chosen and weighted with care.
The adjustments are where most disputes about a construction valuation begin, so each one is set out in the report with the reason behind it. The items that recur for this industry are:
Melbourne's construction work splits along clear lines. Residential builders follow the growth corridors, from Werribee and Point Cook in the west through Craigieburn and Mickleham in the north to Cranbourne and Pakenham in the south-east, where volume builders and their subcontractors carry most of the housing task. Civil contractors look instead to the state's public infrastructure programme, the Big Build, which has shaped road, rail and utility pipelines across the metropolitan area and drawn a tier of subcontractors and plant hire businesses in behind the head contractors.
Work type is the real differentiator in the risk assessment. A civil contractor on government panel work or a subcontract package under a major project has forecastable revenue and, generally, better payment terms than a builder exposed to private residential development. Security of payment in Victoria runs under the Building and Construction Industry Security of Payment Act 2002 (Vic), and a contractor's history of using it, or of being on the receiving end of it, tells a valuer something about the claims book. Registration with the Victorian Building Authority, and the Domestic Building Contracts Act 1995 (Vic) for home building work, define what a buyer can legally take on.
The sector keeps adding entrants. Construction grew 3.4 per cent in the national count of businesses in 2025 to 2026 (Source: ABS, Counts of Australian Businesses, July 2022 to June 2026, released 18 August 2026), while Victoria recorded a net increase of 19,581 actively trading businesses across all industries in the same year (same source). Much of that growth is new small entrants rather than expansion of existing firms, which is part of why margins stay thin and why a Melbourne contractor's value rests so heavily on the recoverable asset position.
The report records the purpose of the engagement, the standard of value, the valuation date and the information relied upon, including the gaps. It then sets out each approach considered, the method used under it, each adjustment with its reason, and reconciles the results into a range, explaining the weighting in sentences rather than through a formula.
Under review, the reconciliation is what holds or fails. If the report cannot say why the asset result was preferred to the income result, or why a particular point in the range was chosen, an opposing expert in the Supreme Court of Victoria or a liquidator's solicitor will find that weakness first. Reports are prepared consistently with APESB, APES 225 Valuation Services and are signed by a credentialed certified valuer who will explain and defend the opinion.
Which assumption in this report would an opposing expert challenge first, and what is your answer to it? If the valuer cannot say, the work is not finished.
An Indicative valuation suits an owner testing the equity that actually sits behind the work in progress and the plant. It is for internal decision-making and is not written for third party reliance. A Summary report fits a sale, a shareholder change, a bonding requirement or a finance application. A Detailed report is required for family law, a shareholder dispute, an insolvency matter and anything that another expert will review.
Purpose decides depth. Where a court, a lender, the ATO or an opposing expert is likely to read the report, more of the reasoning needs to be on the page.
For internal decision-making. Useful for testing an offer, setting an expectation before a negotiation, or deciding whether to go to market. It is not written for third party reliance.
Sets out the approaches applied, the normalisation adjustments made and the reasoning behind the conclusion. The usual choice for a sale, an ownership change or a finance application.
Applies and reconciles all relevant approaches in full. The level required where a court, the ATO, a lender or another expert will review the opinion.
Talk your situation through with a certified valuer before you commit to anything, at no cost.