Melbourne Business Valuation FAQ: 65 Answers in 13 Topics
Straight answers for Melbourne owners, directors and their advisers. Pick a topic below, or read from the top: the sections run from first principles to the specialised questions we are asked in disputes, tax matters and deals.
Disclaimer: Information on this site is general only and not professional advice. InteleK Business Valuations & Advisory Pty Ltd makes no warranties regarding accuracy. Use is subject to our website Terms and Conditions.
1
Fundamentals of Business Valuation
Start here: what a valuation is, what market value means, how long the work takes and when you need one.
A business valuation is a structured opinion on what a business, or a parcel of shares or units in it, is worth at a stated date. The certified valuer works through the financial statements, the assets and liabilities, the market the business trades in and the earnings it can reasonably be expected to produce, then applies recognised methods to arrive at a figure. The opinion is usually expressed as a range with a preferred point, and it is only as good as the evidence and reasoning set out in the report.
A defensible valuation survives a hostile reader: an ATO reviewer, the other side's expert, a judge of the Supreme Court of Victoria or the Federal Circuit and Family Court. The ingredients are consistent. A credentialed certified valuer signs it. It follows APES 225 and the International Valuation Standards. It considers the income, market and asset approaches and explains why one leads. Every assumption is stated and every source is cited, so a reader can retrace the path to the number. A second reviewer checks it before release. A report built this way is accepted by lenders, courts and regulators, and the valuer is prepared to defend it under cross-examination.
The answer depends on which report you need and how quickly your documents arrive. Indicative, Summary and Detailed reports are delivered from seven business days after receipt of all information. Detailed reports for litigation, a Commercial Court dispute or a contested family law matter usually run longer because more analysis and a second review sit behind them. An Indicative report is intended for internal decision-making and is not a certified opinion for lenders, courts or the ATO. In practice the biggest variable is you: a complete set of financials on day one keeps the clock short.
Market value is the price a willing but not anxious buyer would pay a willing but not anxious seller, both properly informed and dealing at arm's length. The High Court set out that test in Spencer v Commonwealth (1907) and it still underpins the ATO's market valuation guidelines, which govern CGT events, the market value substitution rule in section 116-30 of the ITAA 1997, deceased estates and Division 83A valuations for employee share schemes. Where the valuation is for financial statements, the equivalent measure is fair value under AASB 13: the price to sell an asset or transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.
The label changes; the work does not. In Australia the recognised term is 'valuation', which is the language of APES 225 and the International Valuation Standards. Some overseas markets and some brokers use other labels for the same exercise, and an 'estimate' from a broker or an online tool is not a valuation at all. What matters is who does the work and how: a credentialed certified valuer, a recognised method applied to normalised figures, and a report that meets APES 225 and IVS. Ask for that, whatever the document is called.
The common triggers are a sale or purchase, a merger, a restructure or rollover, a CGT event (including a transfer at other than arm's length under section 116-30 of the ITAA 1997), a deceased estate, a family law property settlement in the Melbourne or Dandenong registry, a shareholder or partnership dispute, succession to the next generation, an SMSF acquiring or holding business assets, bank finance, and any employee share scheme grant under Division 83A. Beyond those events, an owner who refreshes the valuation every two to three years, or after any material change, makes better decisions and is never caught without a current figure.
2
Why and When a Valuation Is Needed
The events that call for a valuation, from a sale or a family law settlement to an ATO or SRO matter, and what each one demands of the report.
Because the alternative is guessing. A seller with a certified valuation knows the floor for negotiation and can show a buyer how the figure was built; a buyer with one knows whether the asking price for that Dandenong South fabricator or Fitzroy cafe is supported by the earnings. The report also does jobs beyond the negotiation: it satisfies a lender, documents market value for CGT and the small business concessions, and, if the deal later turns sour, gives you an independent record of what the business was worth on the day. For an acquisition, the analysis behind the number is as useful as the number, because it surfaces the risks in the target's figures.
Australia has no death or gift duty, but moving a business into a family trust, to the next generation or between entities is still a CGT event, and the ATO substitutes market value for whatever was actually paid under section 116-30 of the ITAA 1997. Assets passing through a deceased estate generally carry the deceased's cost base under section 128-15, yet the executor still needs a date-of-death value for the Supreme Court of Victoria Probate Office, for any Part IV family provision claim under the Administration and Probate Act 1958 (Vic) and for later CGT calculations. A market valuation also identifies legitimate minority and marketability discounts on any non-controlling stake being transferred.
Yes, where a business or a shareholding forms part of the property pool. The Federal Circuit and Family Court of Australia, sitting at the Melbourne and Dandenong registries, expects an independent valuation by a qualified certified valuer that complies with APES 225 and the Court's expert evidence rules. The report must consider each relevant approach, normalise the accounts (owner drawings, related-party rent, personal spending) and reach a clear conclusion of value at the relevant date. The parties usually agree on a single expert; where they cannot, each side instructs its own and the experts may be asked to confer and narrow the issues.
The ATO looks for a market valuation whenever a tax outcome turns on what a business or share parcel is worth: CGT events, non-arm's length transfers between related parties, the small business CGT concessions and their net asset value test, Division 7A arrangements involving company assets, SMSF acquisitions of business real property or unlisted shares, and employee share scheme grants under Division 83A. Its market valuation guidelines expect a qualified valuer, a recognised method and a report a reviewer can retrace. State taxes are separate: in Victoria the SRO assesses land transfer duty and landholder duty under the Duties Act 2000 (Vic), and those assessments also rely on a supportable value.
Often, but not always. Where the valuation is obtained for the purpose of producing assessable income or running the business (a sale, meeting a lender's requirement, a restructure) the fee is commonly deductible or forms part of the cost base of the asset. Where it is obtained for a private purpose, such as a family law settlement, it generally is not. The treatment follows the purpose and the character of the outlay under the Income Tax Assessment Act, and the answer for your circumstances belongs to your accountant, not the valuer. We describe the purpose clearly in the engagement letter so your adviser can make that call.
Almost always. Disputes between shareholders or partners come down to the price of the interest being bought out, and each side arrives with a different number in mind. An independent valuation gives the negotiation, mediation or court proceeding an objective anchor. Oppression claims under the Corporations Act are heard in the Commercial Court of the Supreme Court of Victoria, and a partnership dissolution runs under the Partnership Act 1958 (Vic); in both, the judge will expect an expert report that meets the Form 44A code of conduct. Check your shareholders' agreement first: many set a valuation mechanism or trigger, and where yours is silent a current valuation matters even more.
3
Approaches and Methods
The income, market and asset approaches, the methods beneath them and how a certified valuer decides which one leads.
Every recognised method sits under one of three approaches. The income approach asks what the future earnings are worth today, using discounted cash flow or capitalisation of earnings. The market approach asks what buyers have paid for comparable businesses, applying multiples of revenue, EBITDA or owner's discretionary earnings drawn from transactions or listed companies. The asset approach asks what the assets are worth less the liabilities, restated to market values. A certified valuer considers all three, chooses the one that best fits the purpose and the business, and uses the others as cross-checks so the conclusion is not hostage to a single set of assumptions.
DCF values a business as the present value of the cash it is expected to generate. The certified valuer forecasts free cash flow over an explicit period, commonly five years, chooses a discount rate that reflects the risk of those cash flows actually arriving, and adds a terminal value for everything beyond the forecast horizon. Each year's cash flow and the terminal value are then discounted back to today. DCF is the purest expression of intrinsic value and suits businesses with reliable forecasts: contracted revenue, a growth phase that will settle, or a capital program that will change the earnings profile. For a small owner-operated business with no credible forecast, it is usually a cross-check rather than the lead.
Capitalisation of earnings converts one representative year of maintainable earnings into value by dividing it by a capitalisation rate (or, equivalently, multiplying by a multiple). Where DCF projects several years, this method assumes the normalised earnings continue at a broadly stable level, so it suits mature businesses with a settled trading pattern: an established suburban dental practice, a trade contractor with steady repeat work. The capitalisation rate is the discount rate less the expected long-term growth rate, and the choice of maintainable earnings, after normalisation, is where most of the judgement sits.
The market approach starts with evidence of what buyers actually pay: completed sales of similar private businesses, or the trading multiples of listed companies in the same sector. The usual multiples are enterprise value to revenue, enterprise value to EBITDA and price to earnings. The certified valuer selects a comparable set, computes the multiples, then adjusts for the ways the subject differs in size, growth, margin, customer concentration and risk before applying the adjusted multiple to the subject's normalised figures. The method is only as good as the comparables; a set of ASX-listed companies tells you little about a two-partner practice in Box Hill without heavy adjustment.
The asset approach leads when the value sits in what the business owns rather than in what it earns. That covers holding companies and property-owning entities, businesses being wound up or trading below a going-concern return, and asset-heavy operators, such as a plant-rich manufacturer in Dandenong South or a transport yard in Laverton North, whose earnings do not justify more than the equipment and land are worth. The method restates every asset and liability to market value, which often means separate plant and property valuations, and deducts the liabilities to arrive at net asset value. For a profitable service business it is a floor, not an answer.
EBITDA (earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation) assumes the owner's job is done by a salaried manager, so a market salary is deducted before the multiple is applied. SDE (seller's discretionary earnings, sometimes called owner's benefit) adds the working owner's salary and personal perks back on top of EBITDA, because the buyer of a Brunswick cafe or a one-truck courier run will step into the owner's shoes and take that income personally. SDE is the larger figure, so SDE multiples are lower than EBITDA multiples for the same business. Mixing the two, an SDE figure with an EBITDA multiple, is the most common way a self-assessed value ends up wildly high.
4
Advanced Valuation Concepts
Enterprise versus equity value, normalisation, WACC, goodwill and how a discount rate is built up layer by layer.
Enterprise value is the worth of the operating business regardless of how it is funded: the claims of lenders and shareholders combined. Equity value is what remains for the shareholders after net debt and any other prior claims are taken off. The bridge between them is simple in words: equity value equals enterprise value less net debt, plus or minus any working capital adjustment. In a sale, buyers negotiate on enterprise value and then settle the equity price by adjusting for cash, debt and working capital at completion, which is why the headline price and the cheque the vendor receives are rarely the same figure.
Normalisation restates the historical accounts to show what a hypothetical owner would actually earn from the business. The usual adjustments are: stripping out one-off items such as a legal settlement or a flood loss; resetting owner and family remuneration to market rates; removing private expenses run through the business; correcting rent on a related-party lease, for instance a Moorabbin factory owned by the family trust, to market rent; taking out non-operating assets and the income they produce; and aligning accounting policies across the years. Without these steps a multiple is being applied to the wrong earnings, and comparisons with industry data are meaningless.
WACC is the blended return that all of a company's funders, lenders and shareholders together, require for the risk they carry, weighted by the share of debt and equity in the capital structure. It is the discount rate used in a DCF that values the whole enterprise. In words: the cost of equity multiplied by the equity proportion, plus the after-tax cost of debt multiplied by the debt proportion. The cost of equity is the larger input and the harder one to support. A higher WACC means the market sees more risk, and every future dollar is worth less today.
Goodwill is the difference between what the whole business is worth and the market value of its identifiable assets, tangible and intangible, less liabilities. It captures reputation, patient or client relationships, trained staff, location and systems: the things that let a business earn more than a return on its assets. In practice the valuer values the business as a whole using the income or market approach, values the identifiable net assets, and the residual is goodwill. The next question is whether that goodwill belongs to the business or to a person; for a Box Hill dental practice built around one principal, that split can be the whole argument in a family law or sale context.
The build-up method stacks the return an investor would demand for a private business one layer at a time. It starts with the risk-free rate, usually the yield on Australian Government bonds, then adds an equity risk premium for holding shares rather than bonds, a size premium because smaller companies are riskier, an industry premium where the sector warrants it, and finally a company-specific premium for the risks unique to the subject: key person dependence, customer concentration, a lease with two years to run. Unlike the capital asset pricing model it does not need a beta, which cannot be observed for an unlisted company, so it is the usual tool for private company valuations.
5
Discounts and Premiums
Marketability, control and key person adjustments: what they are, why they exist and how they combine.
A DLOM recognises that a share in a private company cannot be sold in an afternoon the way a listed share can. There is no market, the constitution or shareholders' agreement may restrict transfer, finding a buyer takes months and money, and the eventual price is uncertain. The discount is larger for a minority holding than for a controlling one, because the controlling owner can at least sell the whole business. Valuers support the size of the discount with studies of shares subject to sale restrictions, pre-float pricing studies and option-based models, then adjust for the subject company's own facts: dividend history, the likelihood of a sale, and any put or drag-along rights.
A DLOC, also called a minority interest discount, reflects what a non-controlling shareholder cannot do: set strategy, appoint or remove the directors, decide their own remuneration, declare a dividend, or force a sale or wind-up. A buyer of that stake pays less per share than a buyer of control, and the discount measures the gap. It is usually derived from the control premiums observed when listed companies are taken over, since the premium and the discount are two views of the same difference: the discount equals the premium divided by one plus the premium. The size depends heavily on the shareholders' agreement and on whether the minority has any real protections.
A control premium is the extra amount a buyer pays, above the pro-rata value of the shares, to obtain control of a company. Control brings the right to set strategy, direct the cash, appoint management and fix its pay, decide dividends and ultimately sell or wind up the business. The premium is observed in takeovers of listed companies, where the offer price is compared with the pre-bid share price, and it varies with the industry, the size of the target and the circumstances of the deal. For private companies it is used mainly in reverse, to derive the minority discount applied to non-controlling parcels.
Yes, and for a minority holding in a private company they usually are, because the interest suffers from both problems: the holder cannot direct the company and cannot readily sell out. The discounts are applied in sequence rather than added. As an illustration, from a controlling marketable value of 100, a 25 per cent control discount leaves 75, and a 30 per cent marketability discount on that leaves 52.5, not 45. The certified valuer must also make sure the same risk is not counted twice, since some factors, such as a restrictive shareholders' agreement, affect both marketability and control.
A key person discount reflects the risk that the business would lose earnings, clients or capability if one individual left: the founder who holds the client relationships at a Cremorne agency, the surgeon whose name fills the list, the estimator every tender depends on. Rather than pick a percentage, the valuer estimates how much of the earnings would follow that person out the door and how long replacement would take, then either reduces the maintainable earnings or lifts the company-specific risk premium to match. The discount is common in professional practices, small businesses and founder-led companies, and it shrinks as management depth, documented systems and transferable relationships grow.
6
Industry-Specific Questions
How the method changes for hospitality, medical practices, manufacturers, professional firms and businesses with a dominant customer.
Hospitality is valued on normalised earnings, usually a multiple of EBITDA, or of owner's discretionary earnings for an owner-run venue, with revenue multiples used only as a sanity check. The lease carries as much weight as the trading: a Fitzroy or Brunswick cafe with three years left and no option is a different asset from one with a fresh ten-year term under the Retail Leases Act 2003 (Vic). The valuer looks at covers and revenue per seat, food and labour cost percentages, wage compliance, the liquor licence held with Liquor Control Victoria and the remaining life of the fit-out. Staff turnover, input cost swings and seasonality all lift the risk premium.
Practices are valued on maintainable earnings after paying every practitioner, including the owner, a market rate for the clinical work they do; what is left is the practice's own profit, and that is what a buyer pays for. Reliable demand, Ahpra and Medicare regulation and long patient relationships support the value, but the valuer tests how much of it is personal goodwill that would leave with the principal, especially in a sole-practitioner clinic. Other inputs are the billing mix (bulk-billed, private, out of pocket), practitioner contracts and tenure, and payroll tax exposure on contractor arrangements, including the Victorian exemption for bulk-billed GP consultations administered by the SRO. Suburban clusters like Box Hill and Glen Waverley supply useful comparables.
Manufacturers are valued on two legs: earnings and the plant that produces them. The valuer applies an earnings multiple or a DCF to normalised EBITDA, then checks it against the net asset value of the equipment, stock and premises, because a buyer will not pay much above what the assets alone would fetch unless the earnings justify it. The specific questions are capacity utilisation, customer concentration, the age of the plant and the capital spend needed to keep it running, supply chain exposure, WorkSafe Victoria compliance and whether revenue comes from contracts or spot orders. Dandenong South and the western corridor around Laverton North give Melbourne a deep pool of transaction evidence.
Accounting, legal, engineering and consulting firms are hard to value because the earnings walk out the door on two legs each evening. The valuer capitalises maintainable earnings after market-rate remuneration for every principal, then works out how much of the resulting profit would survive a change of ownership. Client retention, recurring versus one-off work, revenue concentration, restraint of trade clauses and the depth of the second tier all bear on that. A Collins Street firm with institutional clients and a partner track is worth more per dollar of profit than a sole practice whose clients follow the founder. Fee-based rules of thumb exist but are only ever a cross-check.
Heavily. When one customer supplies a large share of revenue, the loss of that account would take a large share of the earnings, so buyers pay less per dollar of profit. As a rule of thumb, valuers start to look hard when a single customer passes roughly 10 to 15 per cent of revenue or the top five exceed half. A Laverton North transport operator with one supermarket contract is the classic case. Mitigants include long-term contracts, high switching costs, a trend toward diversification and the age and depth of the relationship. Where one customer dominates, the valuer often models a scenario in which that customer leaves and weights the outcomes.
7
SaaS & Technology Valuations
Recurring revenue, retention and growth metrics, and how software businesses are valued at every stage from pre-revenue to profitable.
SaaS businesses are usually valued on recurring revenue rather than on profit, because a company in growth mode reinvests almost everything and may show little or no EBITDA. The core metric is annual recurring revenue, and the multiple applied to it rises with growth rate, gross margin, retention and the predictability of the revenue base. Buyers and investors look at unit economics (customer lifetime value against acquisition cost), net revenue retention, churn and the mix of contract lengths. A profitable, slow-growing SaaS business with a mature customer base is valued more like a traditional business, on earnings. Melbourne's cluster in Cremorne and Richmond gives the valuer local transaction evidence to draw on.
The Rule of 40 is a shorthand test of whether a software company is balancing growth against profitability: add the revenue growth rate to the EBITDA (or free cash flow) margin, and a result above 40 is considered healthy. A business growing at 30 per cent with a 15 per cent margin scores 45 and passes; one growing at 10 per cent with a 5 per cent margin scores 15 and does not. Investors use it because it rewards either fast growth or strong profit and penalises companies that have neither. Companies that clear the threshold generally attract higher revenue multiples, so it is a useful lens on where a subject company sits among its peers.
MRR, monthly recurring revenue, is the subscription revenue a company expects to bill in a month from its active customers. ARR, annual recurring revenue, is MRR multiplied by twelve. Both exclude set-up fees, professional services and anything else that does not recur. ARR is the metric valuers and investors work from because it represents the contracted revenue base on an annual footing. The composition matters as much as the total: new ARR, expansion from upgrades, contraction from downgrades and churned ARR are separated so the valuer can judge whether the base is growing on its own or being propped up by acquisition spend.
NRR measures how much recurring revenue a cohort of existing customers produces a year later, counting upgrades and downgrades but ignoring new customers. At 110 per cent, the same customers are paying 10 per cent more than they were; at 90 per cent, the business must win new customers just to stand still. NRR above 100 per cent means the company grows even with no new sales, which is why investors treat it as evidence of product-market fit and pricing power. It feeds directly into the multiple: a high-NRR business compounds its installed base, so each dollar of ARR is worth more than the same dollar at a business that leaks customers.
With no earnings and no revenue, the standard methods have nothing to grip, so the valuer turns to techniques built for that stage. The venture capital method works back from a plausible exit value and the return an investor would need. Milestone methods (Berkus, scorecard) assign value to what has been achieved: a working prototype, a credible team, a defined market. A DCF on detailed projections is possible but the discount rate must reflect the odds of failure. Priced funding rounds, where they exist, are the best evidence. For a Parkville biomedical spin-out or a Clayton deep-tech start-up, the intellectual property and the founders' track record carry most of the value.
8
Credentials and Standards
The credentials behind a signature, the standards a report must meet and how to choose a firm.
Look for a dedicated business valuation designation alongside a financial one. CBV (Certified Business Valuer) is the dedicated credential, earned through a recognised degree, peer-reviewed valuation work and continuing professional development. CA (Chartered Accountants ANZ) or CPA (CPA Australia) membership shows the accounting grounding, and both bodies bind their members to APES 225 when they value a business. CFA (Chartered Financial Analyst) signals capital markets and discount-rate expertise, ABV is recognised in cross-border work, and FAVI (Fellow of the Australian Valuers Institute) reflects seniority. Whatever the letters, the report must be prepared under APES 225 and the International Valuation Standards; that is the benchmark a Victorian court or the ATO will apply.
CBV is a business valuation credential and nothing else: it requires a tertiary qualification, supervised valuation work that has been peer reviewed, and ongoing professional development in valuation method. CA and CPA are accounting designations. Members of Chartered Accountants ANZ and CPA Australia who prepare valuations must comply with APES 225, and many undertake further valuation training, but the designation itself does not test valuation competence. The strongest signature on an Australian report is a valuer who holds CBV together with CA or CPA, so that method, financial analysis and professional standards all sit with the person who signs.
APES 225 Valuation Services, issued by the Accounting Professional and Ethical Standards Board, is the mandatory standard for members of CA ANZ, CPA Australia and the IPA who value a business; APES GN 20 on scope and extent of work sits beneath it. The International Valuation Standards from the IVSC provide the global framework. ASIC Regulatory Guides 111 and 112 govern the content and independence of expert reports in takeovers and schemes. For financial reporting the relevant AASB standards apply, chiefly AASB 2, AASB 3, AASB 13 and AASB 136. In Victorian litigation the expert must also comply with the Form 44A code of conduct under the Supreme Court rules. Meeting these is what lets a report withstand the ATO, ASIC, a court and the other side.
Start with who will sign the report and what letters follow their name (CBV, CA, CPA, CFA, ABV), then ask whether they have valued your kind of business for your purpose: a family law report for the Melbourne registry is not the same job as a Division 83A valuation for a Cremorne start-up. Ask which standards the report will meet, APES 225 and IVS as a minimum, and whether the valuer will give evidence if it comes to that. Ask about timing, who you will actually deal with, and for references from similar engagements. Walk away from anyone who promises a particular number; independence is the whole point, and a report shaped to a target is worth nothing when tested.
9
The Engagement Process and Your Documents
What happens from first call to signed report, the documents we ask for and the three engagement types under APES 225.
The sequence is consistent. First a conversation to pin down the purpose, the interest being valued and the valuation date. Then a written engagement letter setting out scope, standard of value and deliverables, which APES 225 requires before work begins. You supply the financial and legal documents. The valuer interviews management and, where it helps, visits the site, whether that is a Truganina warehouse or a Docklands office. Next comes analysis of the economy, the industry and the company, normalisation of the accounts, application of the chosen approaches, and reconciliation of the results into a conclusion. A draft is reviewed internally, checked with you for factual accuracy, and the signed report is issued.
Expect to provide three to five years of financial statements and the latest interim figures, the corresponding tax returns, any budgets or forecasts, the company constitution or partnership agreement, the shareholders' agreement and any buy-sell terms, a fixed asset register and stock listing, premises leases, loan facilities and covenants, a customer breakdown by revenue, and short profiles of the key people. Depending on the business we may also ask for WorkCover certificates, licences and registrations, and major supplier or customer contracts. The more complete the pack on day one, the shorter and the sharper the valuation.
The engagement letter is the contract between you and the valuation firm, and APES 225 requires the terms to be agreed in writing before any valuation work starts. It records the purpose, the interest being valued, the valuation date, the standard of value (market value, or fair value under AASB 13 for financial reporting), the scope, the standards the report will follow, the type of report, the timetable and the fee. It also names who may rely on the report, which matters if it is going to a lender, the ATO or a court. Settling these first prevents the most common dispute later: a report that answers a different question from the one you needed answered.
APES 225, read with APES GN 20, defines three engagement types. A Valuation Engagement is the fullest: the certified valuer is free to apply whichever approaches and methods are appropriate and expresses a conclusion of value. A Limited Scope Valuation Engagement narrows the work in some stated way, whether the approaches used, the information available or the intended users, and the report says so. A Calculation Engagement follows procedures agreed with the client in advance, often a single method, and produces a calculated value rather than a conclusion of value. The choice between our Indicative, Summary and Detailed reports follows the same logic: an Indicative report is intended for internal decision-making and is not a certified opinion for lenders, courts or the ATO.
This is where the valuer learns what the accounts cannot show. Over an hour or two with the owner or senior management, the conversation covers the history of the business, what it sells and to whom, where it sits against competitors, who the key staff are and what would happen if they left, how concentrated the customers are, what capital spending is coming, any litigation or regulatory issues, and how much of the operation depends on the owner personally. The answers shape the normalisation adjustments, the risk premium and the choice of method. Owners often find it the most useful part of the process, because it is the first time anyone has asked those questions in order.
10
Employee Share Scheme (ESS) Valuations
Division 83A valuations for employee share schemes: when they are needed, how often, and the compliance traps.
An employee share scheme lets staff acquire shares, options or performance rights in their employer, usually at a discount to market value or for nothing. Division 83A of the ITAA 1997 taxes the employee on that discount, so the company must establish the market value of the shares at grant or at the later taxing point, and for a private company there is no share price to point to. That is where the valuation comes in. For eligible start-ups, Subdivision 83A-E provides concessional treatment and the ATO has approved safe-harbour valuation methods, including one based on net tangible assets, which keep the cost and the compliance risk down. Growing companies in Cremorne and Clayton use these schemes heavily to compete for talent.
A valuation is needed at each ESS taxing point under Division 83A: the grant date for schemes taxed up front, and vesting or the lifting of forfeiture conditions for tax-deferred schemes. Each new round of grants generally needs a fresh valuation unless nothing material has changed since the last one, and start-ups relying on the Subdivision 83A-E safe harbours commonly refresh the figure at every grant. A capital raise, an acquisition, a large contract won or lost, or any other event that could move the value should prompt an interim update, because a stale figure at the next taxing point creates a tax problem for the employee and a compliance problem for the company.
The valuation must be independent, so the valuer cannot have a stake in the company or the outcome. It must use a method the ATO recognises, or for eligible start-ups one of the approved safe-harbour methods under Subdivision 83A-E, and the working must be documented well enough to survive an ATO review years later. The company must also meet its ESS reporting obligations to the ATO and to employees each year. Where the offer needs a disclosure document, the fundraising provisions in Chapter 6D of the Corporations Act and ASIC's ESS relief apply. Where employer shares end up in an SMSF, the in-house asset and related-party rules of the SIS Act add a further layer.
It depends on the plan rules. Vested shares are usually kept by the departing employee; unvested shares, options and performance rights typically lapse or are forfeited. Under a tax-deferred scheme, ceasing employment was for many years a deferred taxing point in its own right, which forced a market valuation at the departure date; that rule has since been changed, so confirm the current position for your plan with your adviser. Where the plan or the constitution gives the company a right to buy the shares back, the buy-back must follow the procedures in Part 2J.1 of the Corporations Act (sections 257A to 257J) and a valuation at the buy-back date sets the price.
11
Technical and Modelling Questions
DCF model construction, sensitivity analysis, terminal value and businesses whose earnings swing with the cycle.
The model starts from three to five years of normalised history to establish trends in revenue, margins and working capital. Revenue is projected from that history, management's forecasts and the state of the market; operating costs, capital expenditure and working capital movements are modelled to produce free cash flow for each forecast year, usually five. A terminal value is estimated for the years beyond, either by growing the final year's cash flow in perpetuity or by applying an exit multiple. The discount rate is WACC when valuing the enterprise, or the cost of equity when valuing the shares directly. Every projected cash flow and the terminal value are then discounted to the valuation date and summed.
Sensitivity analysis shows how far the conclusion moves when one assumption changes. The valuer flexes the discount rate, the growth rate, the margin, the terminal growth rate or the chosen multiple, singly and in pairs, and tabulates the resulting values, often as a grid. The reader can then see which inputs really drive the number and how wide the credible range is, rather than treating a single point as precise. It also disciplines the valuer: if a half-point change in the discount rate swings the value by a third, the report needs to justify that input with particular care. In a contested matter, it is the first thing the other side's expert will examine.
Terminal value captures everything the business earns after the explicit forecast ends, and in most DCF models it is the larger part of the total. There are two ways to compute it. The perpetuity growth method takes the final year's cash flow, grows it one year at a long-term rate, and divides by the discount rate less that growth rate. The exit multiple method applies a market multiple of EBITDA or revenue to the final year's figures. The growth rate must be modest, no higher than the long-run growth of the economy, and the exit multiple must be consistent with the discount rate. Because so much value rides on it, the terminal assumptions get the closest scrutiny in any review.
The aim is to value the business through the cycle, not at its peak or trough. The valuer looks at a longer history, long enough to include a full cycle, and weights the years to arrive at mid-cycle maintainable earnings rather than the latest result. Scenario-based DCF, with expansion, normal and contraction cases weighted by likelihood, is another route. The discount rate is lifted to reflect the extra volatility, and the asset approach is checked as a floor. A civil contractor working the Wyndham and Casey growth corridors is a good example: a bumper year on one estate tells you little about the sustainable earnings of the business.
12
Practical and Strategic Questions
Preparing for a sale, value against price, keeping a valuation current and what to do if you disagree with the result.
Work on the things a buyer discounts. Spread the customer base so no account dominates. Convert ad hoc work into contracts or recurring arrangements. Write down how the business runs so it does not depend on you, and build a second tier of management. Tidy the accounts: separate private spending, settle disputes, and bring the balance sheet current. Lock in a long lease with options and firm up key supplier terms. Keep the plant maintained rather than leaving a capital bill for the buyer. Show a growth trend, not a plateau. Most of these take two to three years to show up in the numbers, so begin well before you plan to go to market.
Value is the valuer's opinion of what the business is worth on its fundamentals, cash flow, assets, risk and prospects, to a hypothetical buyer. Price is what a real buyer pays on the day, and it can sit above or below value depending on the buyer's bargaining position, strategic motives, competing bids, finance terms and the synergies a particular acquirer expects. A trade buyer consolidating a route may pay above market value for the cost savings; a forced or hurried sale often settles below it. The valuation gives you the independent benchmark against which any offer can be judged, and it tells you when a price is a bargain and when it is a mistake.
Every two to three years as a matter of course, and sooner whenever something material happens: a jump or fall in earnings, a major customer won or lost, a change in the shareholding, a new product or market, a large capital investment, disruption in the industry, or any transaction on the horizon. Employee share schemes need a current value at each grant or taxing point under Division 83A, which for an active scheme can mean annual updates. A stale figure is worse than none, because decisions get made on it and regulators, lenders and counterparties will not accept it.
Sometimes, but not automatically. A full Valuation Engagement under APES 225 and IVS can serve several ends, such as CGT, a Division 83A grant, succession planning and a lender, provided the standard of value and the valuation date fit each use; a market value opinion for the ATO cannot double as a fair value figure under AASB 13 for the auditor. A Calculation Engagement or a Limited Scope Valuation Engagement is confined to the purpose named in the engagement letter and should not be recycled. Tell the valuer every intended use before the letter is drafted, so the scope and the standard of value cover all of them from the start.
Raise it. If you think the report contains a factual error or overlooks material information, the valuer should review it and correct anything that is wrong, without charge. What an independent valuer cannot do is move the number because you would prefer a different one; the whole value of the report rests on that. In a dispute, the usual remedy is a second expert: your lawyer can brief another certified valuer to critique the report, and in the Supreme Court of Victoria or the Federal Circuit and Family Court the two experts may be directed to confer and produce a joint statement of where and why they differ. That process usually narrows the gap.
13
Advanced Valuation Topics
Loss-making businesses, personal goodwill, group structures, option pricing allocations and cross-border engagements.
A loss-making business is not a worthless one if it holds saleable assets, intellectual property, a customer base or a credible route to profit. The valuer chooses the tool that fits the reason for the losses. A DCF with explicit projections through to profitability works where the losses are a growth investment. Revenue multiples from comparable transactions apply to businesses bought for their customer base. The asset approach sets a floor where the losses look permanent, and for a start-up the venture capital and milestone methods replace earnings-based ones altogether. The report must be candid about the odds of the turnaround it relies on.
Personal goodwill is the part of a business's value that attaches to an individual, their reputation, relationships and skill, rather than to the business itself, which is enterprise goodwill. It matters in two places. In a family law property settlement, the Federal Circuit and Family Court considers whether the goodwill could be sold with the business or would walk out with the practitioner; goodwill that cannot be sold may be given little value as property even though it supports the owner's income. In a sale, a buyer pays for what transfers, so personal goodwill is protected through restraint of trade clauses, handover periods and earn-outs rather than counted in the headline price.
A group is valued as the sum of its parts and then adjusted for the structure that holds them together. Each operating entity is valued on the method that suits it, since a trading subsidiary and a property-owning one need different treatment. Non-operating assets held at the parent (property, investments, surplus cash) are added at market value. The valuer then considers the effects of the structure itself: inter-company loans and charges that must be eliminated, transfer pricing that distorts where the profit appears, tax embedded in unrealised gains, and the discount a buyer applies to complexity. In a family group the trust and company layers often need mapping before any valuing can start.
The option pricing method is used to share enterprise value between different classes of equity, such as ordinary shares, preference shares with liquidation preferences, options and convertible notes, in a start-up with a layered capital structure. Each class is treated as a call option over the company's value, with an exercise price set by the preferences that must be paid out first; a Black-Scholes or binomial model then allocates value to each class. In a backsolve, the valuer starts from the price paid in a recent funding round for one class and works backwards to imply the value of the whole and of the ordinary shares, which is why auditors and ESS valuers favour it.
A cross-border valuation adds layers to the domestic one. Projections must be set in a functional currency and translated consistently; a country risk premium is added to the discount rate for the foreign operations; accounting standards differ, so IFRS as adopted in Australia through the AASB must be reconciled to the local standards of the other jurisdiction; transfer pricing shapes where profit is reported; and tax regimes change the after-tax cash flows. The report may need to satisfy APES 225 for the Australian signature, IVS for consistency and a local standard abroad. A foreign buyer of Australian assets may also need foreign investment approval, one more reason for the value to be well documented.